Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Screw Loose Change Video Mentioned In Dallas Morning News

James Raglan, apparently a local columnist for the DMN, notes:

Before I get started, let me say this column is not a critique of Loose Change, the independent Internet film that suggests some U.S. government officials may have staged the 9/11 attacks.

Nor is this about Screw Loose Change, an equally delightful documentary that responds to the conspiracy theories and speculation contained in the aforementioned flick. If nothing else, you've got to love the in-your-face title.


Heheh. I wish more people would get the double entendre of "screw loose" as much as they got the screw "Loose Change" part, but what the hey, it works.

This is pretty good:

For what it's worth, I don't consider Mr. Cuban a loose – make that looser – cannon for financing the distribution of the flick. I watched Loose Change, and its rival, on the Internet and found them both to be quite – how should I put this – amusing.

Both films address probing, provocative questions. The problem I have with Loose Change lies in its answers, many of which are based on loosely strung-together facts, speculations and inferences that, when mixed together, drive conspiracy theorists wild.


Cuban is loving this, because everybody is talking about Mark Cuban and what he's doing. But he's full of it when he says:

"I don't believe the movie. Not at all," Mr. Cuban explained. "But I do believe that lies in the shadows are far more dangerous than lies you can confront and refute. There probably will be a movie that responds to this one, and we would be more than happy to distribute it as well, for the very same reason."


Hey, Mark, James just mentioned a movie that responds to this one. Why don't you put it on the same DVD?

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

At 29 March, 2007 00:16, Blogger Unknown said...

How about Loose Change with a 'Screw Loose Change' DVD subtitle option? Haha

 
At 29 March, 2007 00:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Update: 9/11 "Cuban Crisis" (all Video Mixes)
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=3115

 
At 29 March, 2007 16:19, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 30 March, 2007 00:41, Blogger Der Bruno Stroszek said...

Jenny, you may not have noticed this, but no spammers are banned on this blog. In fact, no-one barring impostors have been banned, no matter what they're saying. Your Pat and Nico conspiracy theory is as threadbare and idiotic as all your other ones.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home